Low-code solutions can reduce the development time by 90%

Only Developers

Traditional development is strictly for developers and that too, with very specific skills. Business owners with limited tech knowhow find it difficult to keep up with what’s happening.

High upfront investment

From recruiting developers to developing the infrastructure, conventional development is generally an expensive affair. Not only is there a huge financial barrier to get started, it keeps your pocket draining throughout the process.

Long and unpredictable timelines

With a long list of stages to go through, traditional software development ends up consuming a lot of time. Extensive wireframing, product management, development, QA, etc., demand their dues and unforeseen bottlenecks end up extending timelines.

Needs a separate development cycle

With a long list of stages to go through, traditional software development ends up consuming a lot of time. Extensive wireframing, product management, development, QA, etc., demand their dues and unforeseen bottlenecks end up extending timelines.

Go through complete software dev cycle

Making changes in a conventional development cycle can turn out to be a chore, especially if it has to be done at the later stages. With fixed architecture and various applications, it is both difficult and time-consuming to initialise changes.

Requires dedicated efforts and teams.

Developers need to be highly cautious about the security features around the solution. Leaving any stone unturned can prove to be detrimental in terms of safety and privacy at later stages. Oftentimes, there is a need for a dedicated team to take care of security.

Long integration processes

Clubbing conventional software solutions with the existing setup can turn out to be challenging. There are also individual integration cycles for platforms and web, making the process even more complex and expensive.

Slow and expensive upgrades.

Every upgrade in traditional development has to be a big leap. And with that big leap comes a great amount of legwork and perhaps also a hole in your pocket.

Resource-consuming.

You’d need a separate infrastructure management team to monitor all the application-level scaling.

Required a complete in-house team

You’d need full-scale development team support for maintenance and keep them with you throughout the product lifetime. Goes without saying that it would require a lot of infrastructural and financial support.